Not a healthcare professional? Go to the patient or caregiver website.

PRECEDEX Clinical Studies (dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection)

14 CLINICAL STUDIES

The safety and efficacy of Precedex has been evaluated in four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trials in 1185 adult patients.

14.1 Intensive Care Unit Sedation

Two randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trials included 754 adult patients being treated in a surgical intensive care unit. All patients were initially intubated and received mechanical ventilation. These trials evaluated the sedative properties of Precedex by comparing the amount of rescue medication (midazolam in one trial and propofol in the second) required to achieve a specified level of sedation (using the standardized Ramsay Sedation Scale) between Precedex and placebo from onset of treatment to extubation or to a total treatment duration of 24 hours. The Ramsay Level of Sedation Scale is displayed in Table 9.

Table 9: Ramsay Level of Sedation Scale

Clinical Score

Level of Sedation Achieved

6

Asleep, no response

5

Asleep, sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus

4

Asleep, but with brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus

3

Patient responds to commands

2

Patient cooperative, oriented, and tranquil

1

Patient anxious, agitated, or restless

In the first study, 175 adult patients were randomized to receive placebo and 178 to receive Precedex by intravenous infusion at a dose of 0.4 mcg/kg/hr (with allowed adjustment between 0.2 and 0.7 mcg/kg/hr) following an initial loading infusion of one mcg/kg intravenous over 10 minutes. The study drug infusion rate was adjusted to maintain a Ramsay sedation score of ≥3. Patients were allowed to receive “rescue” midazolam as needed to augment the study drug infusion. In addition, morphine sulfate was administered for pain as needed. The primary outcome measure for this study was the total amount of rescue medication (midazolam) needed to maintain sedation as specified while intubated. Patients randomized to placebo received significantly more midazolam than patients randomized to Precedex (see Table 10).

A second prospective primary analysis assessed the sedative effects of Precedex by comparing the percentage of patients who achieved a Ramsay sedation score of ≥3 during intubation without the use of additional rescue medication. A significantly greater percentage of patients in the Precedex group maintained a Ramsay sedation score of ≥3 without receiving any midazolam rescue compared to the placebo group (see Table 10).

Table 10: Midazolam Use as Rescue Medication During Intubation (ITT) Study One
ITT (intent-to-treat) population includes all randomized patients.
*     ANOVA model with treatment center.
**   Chi-square.

 

Placebo
(N = 175)

Precedex
(N = 178)

p-value

Mean Total Dose (mg) of Midazolam

19 mg

5 mg

0.0011*

                    Standard deviation

53 mg

19 mg

 

Categorized Midazolam Use

                              0 mg

43 (25%)

108 (61%)

<0.001**

                            0–4 mg

34 (19%)

36 (20%)

 

                             >4 mg

98 (56%)

34 (19%)

 

A prospective secondary analysis assessed the dose of morphine sulfate administered to patients in the Precedex and placebo groups. On average, Precedex-treated patients received less morphine sulfate for pain than placebo-treated patients (0.47 versus 0.83 mg/h). In addition, 44% (79 of 178 patients) of Precedex patients received no morphine sulfate for pain versus 19% (33 of 175 patients) in the placebo group.

In a second study, 198 adult patients were randomized to receive placebo and 203 to receive Precedex by intravenous infusion at a dose of 0.4 mcg/kg/hr (with allowed adjustment between 0.2 and 0.7 mcg/kg/hr) following an initial loading infusion of one mcg/kg intravenous over 10 minutes. The study drug infusion was adjusted to maintain a Ramsay sedation score of ≥3. Patients were allowed to receive “rescue” propofol as needed to augment the study drug infusion. In addition, morphine sulfate was administered as needed for pain. The primary outcome measure for this study was the total amount of rescue medication (propofol) needed to maintain sedation as specified while intubated.

Patients randomized to placebo received significantly more propofol than patients randomized to Precedex (see Table 11).

A significantly greater percentage of patients in the Precedex group compared to the placebo group maintained a Ramsay sedation score of ≥3 without receiving any propofol rescue (see Table 11).

Table 11: Propofol Use as Rescue Medication During Intubation (ITT) Study Two
*     ANOVA model with treatment center.
**   Chi-square

 

Placebo
(N = 198)

Precedex
(N = 203)

p-value

Mean Total Dose (mg) of Propofol 

513 mg

72 mg

<0.0001*

                Standard deviation

782 mg

249 mg

 

Categorized Propofol Use

                           0 mg

47 (24%)

122 (60%)

<0.001**

                        0–50 mg

30 (15%)

43 (21%)

 

                         >50 mg

121 (61%)

38 (19%)

 

A prospective secondary analysis assessed the dose of morphine sulfate administered to patients in the Precedex and placebo groups. On average, Precedex-treated patients received less morphine sulfate for pain than placebo-treated patients (0.43 versus 0.89 mg/h). In addition, 41% (83 of 203 patients) of Precedex patients received no morphine sulfate for pain versus 15% (30 of 198 patients) in the placebo group.

In a controlled clinical trial, Precedex was compared to midazolam for ICU sedation exceeding 24 hours duration. Precedex was not shown to be superior to midazolam for the primary efficacy endpoint, the percent of time patients were adequately sedated (81% versus 81%). In addition, administration of Precedex for longer than 24 hours was associated with tolerance, tachyphylaxis, and a dose-related increase in adverse events [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)].

14.2 Procedural Sedation

The safety and efficacy of Precedex for sedation of non-intubated patients prior to and/or during surgical and other procedures was evaluated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trials. Study 1 evaluated the sedative properties of Precedex in patients having a variety of elective surgeries/procedures performed under monitored anesthesia care. Study 2 evaluated Precedex in patients undergoing awake fiberoptic intubation prior to a surgical or diagnostic procedure.

In Study 1, the sedative properties of Precedex were evaluated by comparing the percent of patients not requiring rescue midazolam to achieve a specified level of sedation using the standardized Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (see Table 12).

Table 12: Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation

Assessment Categories

Responsiveness

Speech

Facial

Expression

Eyes

Composite Score

Responds readily to name spoken in normal tone

Normal

Normal

Clear, no ptosis

5 (alert)

Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone

Mild slowing or thickening

Mild relaxation

Glazed or mild ptosis (less than half the eye)

4

Responds only after name is called loudly and/or repeatedly

Slurring or prominent slowing

Marked relaxation (slack jaw)

Glazed and marked ptosis (half the eye or more)

3

Responds only after mild prodding or shaking

Few recognizable words

2

Does not respond to mild prodding or shaking

1 (deep sleep)

Patients were randomized to receive a loading infusion of either Precedex 1 mcg/kg, Precedex 0.5 mcg/kg, or placebo (normal saline) given over 10 minutes and followed by a maintenance infusion started at 0.6 mcg/kg/hr. The maintenance infusion of study drug could be titrated from 0.2 mcg/kg/hr to 1 mcg/kg/hr to achieve the targeted sedation score (Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale ≤4). Patients were allowed to receive rescue midazolam as needed to achieve and/or maintain an Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale ≤4. After achieving the desired level of sedation, a local or regional anesthetic block was performed. Demographic characteristics were similar between the Precedex and comparator groups. Efficacy results showed that Precedex was more effective than the comparator group when used to sedate non-intubated patients requiring monitored anesthesia care during surgical and other procedures (see Table 13).

In Study 2, the sedative properties of Precedex were evaluated by comparing the percent of patients requiring rescue midazolam to achieve or maintain a specified level of sedation using the Ramsay Sedation Scale score ≥2 (see Table 9). Patients were randomized to receive a loading infusion of Precedex 1 mcg/kg or placebo (normal saline) given over 10 minutes and followed by a fixed maintenance infusion of 0.7 mcg/kg/hr. After achieving the desired level of sedation, topicalization of the airway occurred. Patients were allowed to receive rescue midazolam as needed to achieve and/or maintain a Ramsay Sedation Scale ≥2. Demographic characteristics were similar between the Precedex and comparator groups. For efficacy results see Table 13.

Table 13: Key Efficacy Results of Procedural Sedation Studies
a    Based on ITT population defined as all randomized and treated patients.
b    Normal approximation to the binomial with continuity correction.

Study

Loading Infusion Treatment Arm

Number of Patients
Enrolleda

% Not Requiring Midazolam Rescue

Confidenceb Interval on the Difference vs. Placebo

Mean (SD) Total Dose (mg) of Rescue Midazolam Required

Confidenceb Intervals of the Mean Rescue Dose

Study 1

Dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg

134

40

37 (27, 48)

1.4 (1.7)

-2.7

(-3.4, -2.0)

Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg

129

 54

51 (40, 62)

0.9 (1.5)

-3.1

(-3.8, -2.5)

placebo

63

3

4.1 (3.0)

Study 2

Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg

55

53

39 (20, 57)

1.1 (1.5)

-1.8

(-2.7, -0.9)

placebo

50

14

2.9 (3.0)

Did you find an answer to your question? Yes No
Did you find an answer to your question? Yes No